Current:Home > MyAnimal welfare advocates file lawsuit challenging Wisconsin’s new wolf management plan-DB Wealth Institute B2 Expert Reviews
Animal welfare advocates file lawsuit challenging Wisconsin’s new wolf management plan
View Date:2024-12-24 07:34:57
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — Animal welfare advocates filed a lawsuit Wednesday seeking to invalidate Wisconsin’s new wolf management plan, accusing state wildlife officials of violating the state’s open meetings law and disregarding comments from wolf researchers and supporters.
The lawsuit reflects how contentious the debate over wolf management has become in Wisconsin. Farmers in northern Wisconsin have complained for years that the population is multiplying too quickly and preying on their livestock. Hunters argue wolves are devastating the deer population across the northern reaches of the state. Conservationists believe that wolves have yet to firmly establish themselves in Wisconsin and need protection.
The Great Lakes Wildlife Alliance, also known as Friends of the Wisconsin Wolf and Wildlife, filed the latest lawsuit in Dane County Circuit Court. The organization describes itself as a statewide group of hunters, farmers, politicians, business owners and animal welfare advocates who support science-based conservation.
The lawsuit alleges that Department of Natural Resources policy board members collected comments on the plan from interest groups it favored even after the public comment period ended in February.
Board members attended private discussions hosted by the Wisconsin Wildlife Federation, the Wisconsin Association of Sporting Dogs, and Wisconsin Wolf Facts in February, April and July, the lawsuit alleges. Great Lakes Wildlife Alliance members were not allowed at the April and July meetings, according to the lawsuit. The filing does not say if members were barred from the February meeting.
The lawsuit alleges that even though a quorum of board members didn’t attend any of the meetings, enough of them participated to influence changes to the plan. Adam Payne, the department secretary at the time, announced revisions were coming after the February talks with the organizations that favor further limiting the wolf population. That all amounts to violating open meetings statutes, according to the lawsuit.
The filing goes on to allege that DNR officials gave little weight to scientific studies questioning the accuracy of the department’s wolf population counts and comments warning that hunting and trapping wolves won’t reduce conflicts with humans. They also failed to evaluate the dangers of overhunting wolves, the lawsuit asserts, and allowed opinions and unverified accounts of wolf aggression against hunters to influence the plan. The lawsuit doesn’t cite any specific instances to back up those claims.
DNR spokesperson Molly Meister said when reached via email late Wednesday afternoon that she couldn’t comment on pending litigation.
The Department of Natural Resources adopted a wolf management plan in 1999 that called for capping the population at 350 wolves. The latest DNR estimates, however, indicate the population currently stands at around 1,000.
Republican legislators in 2012 passed a law requiring the DNR to hold an annual wolf hunting season. Hunters and farmers have pointed to the 350-wolf limit as justification for setting high kill quotas, angering animal rights activists.
A federal judge last year placed gray wolves in the lower 48 states back on the endangered species list, making hunting illegal and limiting farmers to nonlethal control methods, such as fencing in livestock or using guard dogs. The DNR has been working on an updated wolf management plan in case wolves are removed from the list and hunting can resume.
The department’s board finally approved a plan last month that recommends maintaining the statewide population at about 1,000 wolves, but doesn’t set a hard limit. It instead recommends allowing the population to grow or decline at certain numerical thresholds.
DNR officials called it a flexible compromise, but farmers and hunters have criticized the lack of a hard population cap. Republican lawmakers are advancing a bill that would force the DNR to insert a specific number in the plan.
veryGood! (8)
Related
- College football top five gets overhaul as Georgia, Miami both tumble in US LBM Coaches Poll
- Q&A: Sustainable Farming Expert Weighs in on California’s Historic Investments in ‘Climate Smart’ Agriculture
- ESPYS 2023: See the Complete List of Nominees
- In Corpus Christi’s Hillcrest Neighborhood, Black Residents Feel Like They Are Living in a ‘Sacrifice Zone’
- Cruel Intentions' Brooke Lena Johnson Teases the Biggest Differences Between the Show and the 1999 Film
- Super Bowl commercials, from Adam Driver(s) to M&M candies; the hits and the misses
- Warming Trends: Climate Divide in the Classroom, an All-Electric City and Rising Global Temperatures’ Effects on Mental Health
- How Biden's latest student loan forgiveness differs from debt relief blocked by Supreme Court
- Lions QB Jared Goff, despite 5 interceptions, dared to become cold-blooded
- Our 2023 valentines
Ranking
- Black, red or dead: How Omaha became a hub for black squirrel scholarship
- The social cost of carbon: a powerful tool and ethics nightmare
- What to know about the train derailment in East Palestine, Ohio
- Former NFL players are suing the league over denied disability benefits
- Unexpected pairing: New documentary tells a heartwarming story between Vietnam enemies
- Soft Corals Are Dying Around Jeju Island, a Biosphere Reserve That’s Home to a South Korean Navy Base
- Instagram and Facebook launch new paid verification service, Meta Verified
- Without ‘Transformative Adaptation’ Climate Change May Threaten the Survival of Millions of Small Scale Farmers
Recommendation
-
Unexpected pairing: New documentary tells a heartwarming story between Vietnam enemies
-
Nearly 30 women are suing Olaplex, alleging products caused hair loss
-
Republicans Seize the ‘Major Questions Doctrine’ to Block Biden’s Climate Agenda
-
24 Bikinis for Big Boobs That Are Actually Supportive and Stylish for Cup Sizes From D Through M
-
Is Kyle Richards Finally Ready to File for Divorce From Mauricio Umansky? She Says...
-
Nearly 30 women are suing Olaplex, alleging products caused hair loss
-
When an Oil Company Profits From a Pipeline Running Beneath Tribal Land Without Consent, What’s Fair Compensation?
-
DeSantis' campaign is brutally honest about trailing Trump in presidential race, donors say